Sunday, July 10, 2005

making deals with the enemy

In today's news, North Korea is entering nuclear talks with the west. North Korea, remember, probably ranks number one in the west's list of evil nations. Yet they are willing to talk. Let's talk about evil groups for a while.

For any group to be successful, they need to cooperate and compromise. I'm not talking about individuals - a serial killer can do a great deal of evil without any help. But for organizations, by definition they need to compromise and cooperate to survive. Ironically, their words may say the precise opposite, because strong leaders need a simple message that everyone understands. So the words may say "no compromise!" but the actions say something different.

I have found this to be the case with every "evil" group I have ever seen. From the Nazis to suicide cults to Stalinist Russia - all of them. The more they compromise (usually in secret), the longer they survive. The less they compromise, the quicker they destroy themselves. It's called realpolitik. Which leads to the conclusion that, no matter how bad things may seem, if the enemy is organized, we can talk with them. I try to keep these blogs as short as possible, so let's just look at North Korea. Maybe another day we can talk about other "evil" groups.

North Korea's economy is in a real mess and has been for years. So why hasn't it collapsed? For the answer, visit http://www.policyreview.org/oct04/eberstadt_print.html Here is a summary. North Korea has not collapsed because... (drum roll please) George W. Bush's government has been supporting it. In public, we are mortal enemies. In private, we (wisely) cooperate where we can. Here are the key points:

The USSR stopped subsidies in 1991. The already bad NK economy got worse - leading to famine in the mid 1990s (this was the only industrialized nation ever to have a famine). The terrible trade levels with the west - even before 1991 - were the result of a deliberate policy to avoid CocaColanisation. But since then things have got a little better:
  • There has been a small improvement in exports
  • China sells NK goods that will never be paid for
  • South Korea secretly sends money (lots of family connections)
  • Illegal trade - counterfeiting, arms, drugs
  • Following America's lead, other nations have transferred money in various forms (e.g. high fees for tourism, inspection, plus humanitarian aid, etc.). - including significant amounts since GWB got his job.
Why has the west done this? Uniquely among all nations, NK treats its military as a revenue generator and key to economic success: partly this is through illegal arms sales, but partly, the threat of nuclear weapons is what keeps the aid coming! This might be a good idea, it might not - certainly if it avoids nuclear war and allows secret diplomacy, it is a very small price to pay.

Finally, there is evidence of small but real economic reforms: markets and billboards are appearing, and money is becoming important (most people probably survived by barter during the famine). So in ten years time, NK might be like China is now, and things will slowly, very slowly, get better for everyone.

In public we talk tough. But in private we cooperate where we can, and this should slowly remove the threat of global nuclear war. Yes, you can cooperate with your enemies, and yes it does work.

5 Comments:

Blogger Randy said...

Another excellent example of the phenomenon you describe is the PLO. That group was nearly destroyed by the Israelis--and nearly rendered irrelevant by Hamas--when the Oslo Accord brought it back into the picture.

The world would be better off without Kim Jong Il and his merry band of Stalinists. However, they are a nasty reality, and there appears to be no clean way to get rid of them. Also, does South Korea really want to deal with the sudden tide of refugees that would flood across the border in the event of a regime collapse up north?

3:49 PM  
Blogger Chris Tolworthy said...

And another example is the IRA. (not the American tax system, the Irish Republican Army). As Churchill said, jaw jaw is better than war war.

5:04 PM  
Blogger doug said...

CRS Report for Congress

Updated February 11, 2005

U.S. Assistance to North Korea: Fact Sheet

Mark E. Manyin

Specialist in Asian Affairs

Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division

Summary

Since 1995, the United States has provided over $1 billion in foreign assistance to the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea (DPRK, also known as North Korea). About 60% has taken the form of food aid and about 40% was energy assistance channeled through the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO), the multilateral organization established in 1994 to provide energy aid in exchange for North Korea’s pledge of that year to halt its existing nuclear program. This report provides statistical details of U.S. aid to North Korea, including the $100,000 pledged in April 2004 to help survivors of a massive train explosion in the northwestern town
of Ryongchon. As the table in the report shows, U.S. assistance to North Korea has fallen significantly over the past two years. In the fall of 2004, the North Korean government began restricting the activities of many humanitarian activities, including
some of those by the World Food Program (WFP). Administration officials, including President Bush, have indicated that United States assistance might be forthcoming if North Korea began dismantling its nuclear programs, a subject being discussed in the
six-party talks. The 108th Congress passed, and President Bush signed, H.R. 4011 (P.L.
108-333), the North Korean Human Rights Act, which includes hortatory language calling for “significant increases” above current levels of U.S. support for humanitarian assistance to be conditioned upon “substantial improvements” in transparency,
monitoring, and access. Pyongyang has cited the Act as evidence of the United States’ “hostile policy” toward North Korea and has used it as justification to suspend its participation in the six-party talks.

1995 0 $0.0 $9.5 $0.2 $9.7
1996 19,500 $8.3 $22.0 $0.0 $30.3
1997 177,000 $52.4 $25.0 $5.0 $82.4
1998 200,000 $72.9 $50.0 $0 $122.9
1999 695,194 $222.1 $65.1 $0 $287.2
2000 265,000 $74.3 $64.4 $0 $138.7
2001 350,000 $102.8 $74.9 $0 $177.6
2002 207,000 $82.4 $90.5 $0 $172.9
2003 40,200 $25.5 $2.3 $0.0 $27.8
2004 110,000 $52.8 $0.0 $0.1 $52.9
2005 — — — — —
Total 2,063,894 $693.5 $403.7 $5.3 $1,102.4

6:48 AM  
Blogger doug said...

Here's the URL for the quote above,

http://www.ndu.edu/library/docs/crs/crs_rs21834_11feb05.pdf

6:49 AM  
Blogger Chris Tolworthy said...

Thanks - I didn't have the latest figures.

8:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home